Holocaust Imagery Taints Gun Control Debate » ADL Blogs
Perspectives & Information on Contemporary Civil Rights Issues
January 24, 2013 8

Holocaust Imagery Taints Gun Control Debate

Update 1/17/14: The polit­i­cal debate over gun con­trol con­tin­ues to be marked by the inap­pro­pri­ate use of Holo­caust imagery by some gun advo­cates. Musi­cian and gun advo­cate Ted Nugent com­pared film pro­ducer Har­vey Wein­stein to a Nazi pro­pa­gan­dist.

Update 3/5/12: The list of inap­pro­pri­ate Holo­caust analo­gies regard­ing gun con­trol con­tin­ues to grow. NRA Pres­i­dent David Keene defended the depic­tion of New York Gov­er­nor Andrew Cuomo as Hitler at a rally in Albany protest­ing new state gun reg­u­la­tions. In an inter­view on March 1, Keene said, “Folks that are cog­nizant of the his­tory, not just in Ger­many but else­where, look back to the his­tory, and say we can’t let that sort of thing hap­pen here.”

The charged polit­i­cal debate over gun con­trol in the after­math of the Sandy Hook Ele­men­tary School shoot­ing con­tin­ues to be tainted by inap­pro­pri­ate invo­ca­tions of Hitler, Nazis, and gen­eral Holo­caust imagery.

These com­par­isons, made by polit­i­cal pun­dits on national news pro­grams as well by oth­ers out­side pol­i­tics, are not only mis­placed and offen­sive, rely­ing on fac­tu­ally incor­rect premises and exag­ger­a­tions, but also deflect atten­tion away from an impor­tant national discussion.

One anal­ogy sug­gests that Pres­i­dent Barack Obama is some­how rem­i­nis­cent of Hitler because of his gun con­trol pro­pos­als. For exam­ple, on Jan­u­ary 9, the home­page of The Drudge Report fea­tured an image of Hitler and Stalin with the cap­tion “WHITE HOUSE THREATENSEXECUTIVE ORDERSON GUNS.”

A sim­i­lar com­par­i­son was made by Ohio State Board of Edu­ca­tion Pres­i­dent Debe Tehrar, who posted a num­ber of pro-gun and anti-Obama mes­sages on her Face­book page, includ­ing a photo of Hitler with the cap­tion: “Never for­get what this tyrant said: ‘To con­quer a nation, first dis­arm its cit­i­zens.’ — Adolf Hitler.”

Another com­mon theme that has emerged in recent weeks is that if only the vic­tims of the Holo­caust had bet­ter access to guns, the Nazi regime would not have been able to sys­tem­at­i­cally mur­der so many people.

For exam­ple, Fox News’ Andrew Napoli­tano made this argu­ment in a Jan­u­ary 10 col­umn on FoxNews.com. Napoli­tano wrote that, “If the Jews in the War­saw ghetto had had the fire­power and ammu­ni­tion that the Nazis did, some of Poland might have stayed free and more per­sons would have sur­vived the Holocaust.”

Indi­vid­u­als on the fringes of the polit­i­cal debate also have weighed in with this nar­ra­tive. In a Jan­u­ary 15 col­umn for the web­site World­Net­Daily, dis­graced for­mer Major League Base­ball pitcher John Rocker wrote that “the Holo­caust would have never taken place had the Jew­ish cit­i­zenry of Hitler’s Ger­many had the right to bear arms and defended them­selves with those arms.”

It should be noted that the small num­ber of per­sonal firearms in the hands of the small num­ber of Germany’s Jews (about 214,000) remain­ing in Ger­many in 1938 could in no way have stopped the total­i­tar­ian power of the Nazi Ger­man state. When they had weapons, Jews could sym­bol­i­cally resist, as they did in the 1943 War­saw Upris­ing and else­where, but could not stop the Nazi geno­cide machine. Gun con­trol did not cause the Holo­caust; Nazism and anti-Semitism did.

Invok­ing the Holo­caust in dis­cus­sions of con­tro­ver­sial issues is noth­ing new. Con­spir­acy the­o­rist Lyn­don LaRouche, leader of a fringe polit­i­cal cult that defies cat­e­go­riza­tion, and his sup­port­ers have con­tributed to the divi­sive­ness sur­round­ing the pub­lic debate on health care reform by pro­duc­ing and dis­sem­i­nat­ing mate­ri­als com­par­ing Pres­i­dent Barack Obama and other gov­ern­ment offi­cials to Hitler, Nazis and fas­cists.

Offen­sive Holo­caust analo­gies have also been used by Democ­rats and Repub­li­cans alike on a num­ber of issues, and by pub­lic fig­ures from var­i­ous sec­tors of soci­ety when dis­cussing top­ics rang­ing from abor­tion to ani­mal rights to the Israeli-Palestinian con­flict to LGBT rights.

  • Adina

    Great post! A fan from Orange County.

  • J. Ross

    Great stuff. Thanks!

  • http://www.facebook.com/christopher.boudewyns Christo­pher Boudewyns

    OMG. Dis­gust­ing.

  • http://twitter.com/Rubenoff1 Rubenoff

    all guns for safety must be secure in a steel lock­able gun safe away from children

    Here is a great short video that reminds us to secure all guns in a metal lock­able gun safe away from chil­dren if the video wont play copy and paste the link into your web browser

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfUEONoVoA0

  • jake t.

    wow. So inter­est­ing. great stuff.

  • http://www.facebook.com/robert.l.snyder.5 Robert L Snyder

    While I would agree that “Gun con­trol did not cause the Holo­caust; Nazism and anti-Semitism did.” Being dis­armed surely didn’t help mat­ters, did it? http://home.nra.org/#/nraorg

  • Jack

    If I was a jew in Europe in the 1930s and 1940s, and krys­tal­nacht, killings, beat­ings, now I’m on a cat­tle car going to a labour camp. I just had my only self defence tool taken away by a man that wishes to anni­hi­late me, my fam­ily, and my entire eth­nic­ity. Now, do you think I should be ecsta­tic that I dont have my gun any­more, because the world will be a safer place for me? Or do you think that had I had that gun i would have the slight­est chance at liv­ing one more day, killing one more mon­ster, defend­ing my loved ones? Noone thinks the jews in europe would have sin­gle hand­edly stopped the holo­caust. But it would have done SOMETHING. Per­haps one dead nazi and one liv­ing jew. Jews could have shot those those 214,000 guns with pride.
    Also, the Drudge report ad used the imagery of hitler and stalin, not with ref­er­ence to slaugh­ter of jews but to illus­trate the dif­fer­ence between 1930s dic­ta­tor­ships and 2013 lib­er­ties. This is dif­fer­ent to say, PETA’s “holo­caust on a plate” campaign.

  • http://www.facebook.com/eve.condon Eve Warten­berg Condon

    I don’t usu­ally do this, but…

    Set­ting aside your atro­cious syn­tax and inabil­ity to cap­i­tal­ize proper nouns, you have just writ­ten one of the most idi­otic com­ments I’ve ever read. Ever. I sug­gest read­ing a book about the actual events lead­ing up to the Holo­caust or, since I sus­pect read­ing isn’t your thing, watch a cou­ple of films such as “Amy and Jaguar” and “Schindler’s List.” Then you would get it into your head that guns would not have made one bit of dif­fer­ence. So you shoot one sol­dier before they get you. Awe­some. Now guess how moti­vated the remain­ing Nazi sol­diers are to tor­ture and/or rape you and your fam­ily mem­bers. And I am pretty sure no one attempt­ing to sur­vive a geno­cide shoots their gun with pride–they shoot in ter­ror and because it’s the only option left. Peo­ple like you need to be dropped, firearm in hand, into a 3rd world coun­try plagued by civil car so you can see how glo­ri­ous it is to live and die by a gun. Peo­ple espous­ing your point of view think that life is a movie and that you’re the “good guy with the gun.” Grow up and stop pol­lut­ing the polit­i­cal atmos­phere with this non­sense, or enlist and put your money where your mouth is.