american renaissance » ADL Blogs
Posts Tagged ‘american renaissance’
November 12, 2015 3

Anti-Immigrant Activists Make Common Cause With Extremists

In a col­umn this week for the National Review, Mark Kriko­rian, head of the anti-immigrant think tank Cen­ter for Immi­gra­tion Stud­ies, attempted to defend Kansas Sec­re­tary of State Kris Kobach from crit­i­cism by the South­ern Poverty Law Cen­ter and oth­ers for hav­ing attended an anti-immigration event with racist ties by por­tray­ing the event as innocuous.The event, The Social Con­tract Press Writ­ers Work­shop, was held in Wash­ing­ton, DC, in late October.


Mark Kriko­rian

How­ever, the Work­shop does have ties to extrem­ists. To demon­strate this, one need look no fur­ther than one of the key fig­ures behind The Social Con­tract Press itself: Wayne Lut­ton. Lut­ton, the edi­tor of the Press’s main pub­li­ca­tion, The Social Con­tract, for many years has been a promi­nent fig­ure in the white suprema­cist movement.

While not edit­ing The Social Con­tract, Lut­ton sits on the board of the New Cen­tury Foun­da­tion, a white suprema­cist “think tank” run by Jared Tay­lor of Amer­i­can Renais­sance, a white suprema­cist web­site. Both the Foun­da­tion and the web­site pro­mote ideas of alleged racial dif­fer­ences in intel­li­gence, sup­port the notion of a “white iden­tity,” and oppose mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism and diver­sity. Lut­ton has also spo­ken at Amer­i­can Renais­sance con­fer­ences, as well as con­fer­ences of the bla­tantly white suprema­cist Coun­cil of Con­ser­v­a­tive Cit­i­zens. In addi­tion, Lut­ton has served on the board of the Charles Mar­tel Soci­ety, which pub­lishes the racist and anti-Semitic jour­nal Occi­den­tal Quar­terly.

Attend­ing the Writ­ers Work­shop was not the first time Kobach has turned a blind eye towards the extrem­ist ties of some of his fel­low anti-immigration activists. In 2012, for exam­ple, Kobach par­tic­i­pated in an anti-immigration panel at the Con­ser­v­a­tive Polit­i­cal Action Con­fer­ence along­side Robert Van­der­voort, the head of the anti-immigrant group Pro-English but also the for­mer head of the white suprema­cist Chicagoland Friends of Amer­i­can Renaissance.

Anti-immigrant agi­ta­tors all too fre­quently give a pass to extrem­ists, so long as they share the same anti-immigrant views. Indeed, the fact that Kriko­rian, in his defense of Kobach, neglected to men­tion Lutton’s extrem­ist ties is not surprising—because Kriko­rian turns the same blind eye him­self. Kriko­rian not only spoke at  The Social Con­tract Press Writ­ers Work­shop this year, but in 2013 he also con­tributed an arti­cle to Lutton’s publication.

The real­ity is that Lutton’s Press serves as a bridge between extrem­ists and more osten­si­bly main­stream fig­ures in the anti-immigrant move­ment. The Social Con­tract fre­quently fea­tures white suprema­cists along­side anti-immigrant fig­ures in its pages. Its Writ­ers Work­shop often invites main­stream but prob­lem­atic fig­ures to its events. The Kansas Sec­re­tary of State is one such figure.

Kobach is known for his anti-immigrant views and has drafted some of the harsh­est anti-immigrant laws in the nation. He also has pro­moted the con­cept of self-deportation, the idea that states should put in place poli­cies and prac­tices that make life so dif­fi­cult for undoc­u­mented immi­grants that they will leave the United States “voluntarily.”

Through its jour­nal and con­fer­ences, The Social Con­trast Press tries to main­stream big­otry by fea­tur­ing well-known anti-immigrant fig­ures to give their venues an air of legit­i­macy. But when fig­ures such as Kobach and Kriko­rian lie down with the Press, they only show how immod­er­ate they them­selves are.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

May 7, 2015 8

Point of Contention: A Fractured White Supremacist Take on Immigration


Richard Spencer has advo­cated for a white ethno-state

For over a hun­dred years, since the Ku Klux Klan of the early 20th cen­tury loudly pro­claimed its com­mit­ment to “100% Amer­i­can­ism,” fight­ing immi­gra­tion has been one of the most con­sis­tent hall­marks of white suprema­cists in the United States. For many, immi­gra­tion was noth­ing less than a sin­is­ter Jew­ish plan to flood Amer­ica with non-whites and thereby weaken and ulti­mately destroy the white race.

Because of strongly held con­vic­tions such as these, it is no sur­prise that white suprema­cists have so often been at the fore­front of anti-immigration activism. From Ku Klux Klan mem­bers hold­ing anti-immigration protests to neo-Nazis engaged in vig­i­lante patrols along the U.S.-Mexican bor­der to clos­eted white suprema­cists set­ting up “main­stream” anti-immigration orga­ni­za­tions, these groups have con­sis­tently been a major seg­ment of America’s extreme anti-immigrant fringes.

Yet the evo­lu­tion of the white suprema­cist move­ment in the United States reveals an inter­est­ing phe­nom­e­non. Though white suprema­cists remain united in their intense dis­like of immi­gra­tion and their belief in its alleged dan­ger to the white race, clear diver­gences of opin­ion have emerged among them about how they ought to respond—or, indeed, whether they ought to respond at all.

It may be too gen­er­ous to call them “schools of thought,” but sev­eral clear approaches to the issue of immi­gra­tion now clearly exist among white suprema­cists, each essen­tially stem­ming from a dif­fer­ent set of opin­ions on how to “pre­serve” the white race.

The dif­fer­ing approaches include:

  • Con­tin­u­ing actively to fight against immi­gra­tion by attempt­ing to mobi­lize fear­ful or angry whites using rhetor­i­cal strate­gies that include a focus on chang­ing demo­graph­ics in the United States;
  • Aban­don­ing the active fight against immi­gra­tion to focus instead on cre­at­ing white enclaves within a mul­ti­cul­tural United States, where whites could live with and sup­port each other in a sort of vol­un­tary self-segregation; and
  • Also giv­ing up on fight­ing immi­gra­tion into the United States but going a step fur­ther by cre­at­ing a sep­a­rate ethno-state for whites only—an inde­pen­dent white “homeland.”

Each of these view­points is reflected in the ideas or writ­ings of an advo­cate. Though white suprema­cists have dif­fer­ent approaches to the sub­ject of immi­gra­tion, all are ulti­mately react­ing to the pro­jec­tion that whites will become a minor­ity in the United States in the com­ing decades.

Read the full arti­cle: Point of Con­tention: A Frac­tured White Suprema­cist Take on Immigration

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

March 26, 2015 4

American White Supremacists Attend Russian Nationalist Conference

On March 22, Amer­i­can white suprema­cists Jared Tay­lor and Sam Dick­son addressed the Inter­na­tional Russ­ian Con­ser­v­a­tive Forum in St. Peters­burg, which fea­tured Russ­ian nation­al­ists and rep­re­sen­ta­tives from extreme-right par­ties in Europe. The extreme-right par­ties included Greece’s Golden Dawn, Germany’s National Demo­c­ra­tic Party and Italy’s Forza Nuova. The visit to Rus­sia is another exam­ple of Amer­i­can white suprema­cists try­ing to build ties with their Euro­pean counterparts.

Jared Taylor at Russian conference

Jared Tay­lor at Russ­ian conference

Tay­lor heads Amer­i­can Renais­sance (AR), an online jour­nal that hosts yearly con­fer­ences. He often speaks to audi­ences in Europe about white nation­al­ism in Amer­ica. Over the past three years, he has attended nation­al­ist gath­er­ings in France, Eng­land, Turkey and Hun­gary. The con­fer­ence in Hun­gary in Octo­ber 2014 was hosted by the National Pol­icy, Insti­tute, an Amer­i­can white suprema­cist think tank that also has close ties to nation­al­ists in Europe.

Dick­son is a reg­u­lar speaker at con­fer­ences spon­sored by AR and the white suprema­cist Coun­cil of Con­ser­v­a­tive Cit­i­zens. At the con­fer­ence in Rus­sia, Tay­lor and Dick­son both talked about pre­serv­ing the white race and bat­tling “Third-World immi­gra­tion” in the United States. Appar­ently, both men also lauded Vladimir Putin, the pres­i­dent of Rus­sia, who is seen as a pro­moter of tra­di­tion­al­ist val­ues in the West.

Other white suprema­cists in the U.S. have embraced Putin for encour­ag­ing nation­al­ism and Ortho­dox Chris­tian­ity in Rus­sia. These extrem­ists believe that Putin and Rus­sia rep­re­sent the antithe­sis of the global, mul­ti­cul­tural, mod­ern soci­ety rep­re­sented by Amer­ica and West­ern Europe.

In Feb­ru­ary, William John­son of the Amer­i­can Free­dom Party (AFP) posted an inter­view he gave to Nicholas Truschalov of the nation­al­ist Russ­ian Impe­r­ial Party, who report­edly attended the con­fer­ence in St. Peters­burg. Like Tay­lor and Dick­son, John­son talked about pre­serv­ing the white race in Amer­ica. When Truschalov asked John­son about who was defend­ing national iden­tity and tra­di­tional val­ues in the U.S. John­son named Tay­lor and Dick­son as two sig­nif­i­cant thinkers in the white nation­al­ist move­ment. John­son also declared that the AFP sup­ports nation­al­ists world­wide when Truschalov asked what John­son would like to tell Russ­ian nationalists.

Matthew Heim­bach of the Tra­di­tion­al­ist Youth Net­work has also pro­moted Rus­sia. In a Feb­ru­ary arti­cle enti­tled, “The New Shin­ing City on the Hill: Mother Rus­sia,” Heim­bach praised Rus­sia as the “true defender of Tra­di­tion­al­ism.” He added that Putin is “doing the exact oppo­site of what the Bush and Obama admin­is­tra­tions are doing and that is why Tra­di­tion­al­ists should look to Rus­sia for inspiration.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,