benjamin netanyahu » ADL Blogs
Posts Tagged ‘benjamin netanyahu’
November 7, 2015 1

Getting the U.S.-Israel Relationship Back on Track

By Jonathan Green­blatt
CEO of the Anti-Defamation League

This arti­cle orig­i­nally appeared on The Huff­in­g­ton Post Blog

As Israeli Prime Min­is­ter Ben­jamin Netanyahu arrives this week­end in the U.S. and pre­pares to meet Pres­i­dent Obama next week, there is an oppor­tu­nity for the two coun­tries to reboot rela­tions head­ing into the final stretch of the Obama Administration.

Some believe this will be chal­leng­ing. Many have writ­ten about the per­son­al­ity clash between the two lead­ers. But I think the impact has been exag­ger­ated. How­ever, there cer­tainly have been sig­nif­i­cant pol­icy dif­fer­ences between them over the past sev­eral years.

This was par­tic­u­larly obvi­ous dur­ing the debate around the so-called Iran deal. In that frac­tious exchange, there were tough words exchanged all around. At times, com­pet­ing claims degen­er­ated into slan­der­ous attacks. But both sides should now take a deep breath.

Even deal oppo­nents should rec­og­nize that Pres­i­dent Obama chose a path that he and many experts believed to be sen­si­ble. Based on the analy­sis of experts, the admin­is­tra­tion felt that the Joint Com­pre­hen­sive Plan of Action served not only the U.S. national inter­est but also the inter­ests of our allies in the region, includ­ing Israel. The Anti-Defamation League did not agree with this assess­ment, but many experts and orga­ni­za­tions did.

When he adopted this posi­tion, some fool­ishly labeled the pres­i­dent and his aides as anti-Semitic, a ground­less charge that seems espe­cially weak after a cur­sory review of the facts. Pres­i­dent Obama and his team have con­sis­tently renewed mil­i­tary sup­port for the Jew­ish state and pro­vided diplo­matic sup­port for Israel at the United Nations and in other fora. More­over, not only has the pres­i­dent pro­vided moral sup­port to Israel by link­ing the quest for Jew­ish sov­er­eignty to the Amer­i­can civil rights move­ment, but he has joined U.K. Prime Min­is­ter David Cameron and Pope Fran­cis as world lead­ers who appro­pri­ately have ques­tioned the true moti­va­tions of those who reject Israel’s legit­i­macy as a Jew­ish state.

By the same token, deal sup­port­ers should acknowl­edge that Prime Min­is­ter Netanyahu and the Israeli gov­ern­ment took a strong stance against the deal, not out of a desire to be oppo­si­tional to Pres­i­dent Obama or because of a polit­i­cal agenda. Rather, the Israeli posi­tion was derived from a strongly held view grounded in facts that a mil­i­ta­rized and nor­mal­ized Islamic Repub­lic is an exis­ten­tial threat to Israel. Crit­ics who deny this fact seem dan­ger­ously out of touch with reality.

Indeed, since the deal was signed, the Islamic Repub­lic has explic­itly repeated its refusal to accept Israel as a legit­i­mate mem­ber of the fam­ily of nations. Iran­ian prox­ies con­tinue to pur­sue ter­ror­ism against the Jew­ish state. The hos­til­ity and mil­i­tarism of the regime has not ebbed in any per­cep­ti­ble man­ner. And, if we take the Iran­ian lead­er­ship at their word, includ­ing recent state­ments by Supreme Leader Aya­tol­lah Ali Khamenei, it would appear that Israeli con­cerns are well-founded.

Fur­ther com­pound­ing legit­i­mate pol­icy dif­fer­ences, indi­vid­u­als on both sides occa­sion­ally have resorted to ad home­nim attacks, whether indi­vid­u­als in Jerusalemderid­ing Pres­i­dent Obama as anti-Semitic or unnamed offi­cials in the admin­is­tra­tion dis­parag­ing Prime Min­is­ter Netanyahu as “chicken-s—.” In both cases, offi­cials dimin­ished them­selves and their nations with such crass slander.

Look­ing ahead to the upcom­ing visit, both sides have an oppor­tu­nity to move past the acri­mony and acknowl­edge that the two coun­tries have far more in com­mon than the issues that divide them.

For the U.S., Israel remains a robust democ­racy and a bedrock island of sta­bil­ity in a region that seems less sta­ble by the hour. Israel’s com­mit­ment to the rule of law, basic free­doms and human decency dis­tin­guishes it from every other coun­try and non-state actor in the Mid­dle East. And the Jew­ish state is a hub of inno­va­tion whose tech­no­log­i­cal achieve­ments power our prod­ucts, whose ground­break­ing research sup­ports agri­cul­ture and man­u­fac­tur­ing, and whose sci­en­tific advance­ments enable med­i­cine and uplift human­ity. And the Amer­i­can peo­ple at a grass­roots level empir­i­cally sup­port the Jew­ish state.

For Israel, the U.S, remains its most impor­tant ally. Amer­ica has been unflinch­ing in its sup­port for Israel in inter­na­tional cir­cles and mul­ti­lat­eral fora that all too often ostra­cize the Jew­ish state. The U.S. has been a cru­cial source of mil­i­tary assis­tance but also an extra­or­di­nary reser­voir of eco­nomic sup­port and com­mer­cial invest­ment at a time when the can­cer of “Boy­cotts, Divest­ment and Sanc­tions” con­tin­ues to grow. And America’s bedrock com­mit­ment to a fair and just res­o­lu­tion of the Israeli-Palestinian con­flict, one that guar­an­tees Israel’s legit­i­mate secu­rity inter­ests, remains cru­cial to the long-term prospects for peace in the region.

And, as incite­ment per­sists and vio­lence con­tin­ues to flare, both the U.S. and Israel still share a fun­da­men­tal inter­est in see­ing an even­tual end to the con­flict through a two-state solu­tion. To get the process back on track, pre­lim­i­nary steps will be required, includ­ing a ces­sa­tion of vio­lence on the Pales­tin­ian side and the reestab­lish­ment of trust among both par­ties. Nonethe­less, the U.S. and Israel share an inter­est in facil­i­tat­ing this out­come and achiev­ing a just and last­ing peace for all parties.

Amer­ica and Israel have far more in com­mon than the crit­ics care to men­tion. Next week — when the lead­ers shake hands — it will be an oppor­tu­nity to remind the world of the shared inter­ests that bind the two nations.

Tags: , , , ,

April 23, 2015 0

Israel’s Independence at 67: Living Up to the Ideals of its Founders

By Abra­ham H. Fox­man
National Direc­tor of the Anti-Defamation League

This arti­cle orig­i­nally appeared on The Huff­in­g­ton Post Blog

Israel Flag











As Israel cel­e­brates its 67th Inde­pen­dence Day, it is easy to fall into one or two cat­e­gories in reaction.

One entails an “oy gevalt syn­drome” — the sky is falling.  Just look at Israel, its rela­tions with its main ally, the United States.  An Israeli gov­ern­ment is on the verge of being formed after national elec­tions that looks like it will be more right-wing than its pre­de­ces­sor which may inevitably exac­er­bate rela­tions with the U.S., pos­si­bly fur­ther iso­late Israel from the Euro­pean Union, and spur expanded BDS activ­ity on cam­puses and else­where.  And Israel’s demo­c­ra­tic val­ues may be under assault from a Haredi and right-wing politi­cians who will seek hyper-nationalist leg­is­la­tion lim­it­ing rights to those who express oppo­si­tion to Israeli policies.

The other per­spec­tive is one that says, despite all the com­plaints and crit­i­cisms, Israel has never been doing as well nor in a bet­ter place. U.S.-Israel rela­tions remain strong in spite of the spats between Pres­i­dent Obama and Prime Min­is­ter Netanyahu. Ter­ror against Israeli cit­i­zens is way down.  The regional chaos actu­ally ben­e­fits Israel in two ways:  Dis­tract­ing Israel’s ene­mies from focus­ing on the Jew­ish State, and mov­ing the Saudis and the Gulf States into a tacit alliance with Israel based on the shared inter­est of com­bat­ting Iran­ian expan­sion and aggres­sion.  And Israel’s econ­omy remains strong led by the vital high-tech sec­tor which con­tin­ues to enhance Israel’s busi­ness sta­tus in the world.

I pre­fer to look at this moment through a lens that can both enjoy the mir­a­cle of what Israel has become and still, even on a day of cel­e­bra­tion, be aware of the many chal­lenges fac­ing the Jew­ish State as it heads into its 67th year. Para­phras­ing the old Ben Gurion line, I will rap­tur­ously cel­e­brate the won­der that is mod­ern day Israel as if there were no neg­a­tive real­i­ties sur­round­ing its exis­tence, and I will see clearly and worry a great deal about the strug­gles ahead for Israel as if the mir­a­cle of Israel’s very exis­tence and its devel­op­ment were not relevant.

Another way of putting it is that I am as deter­mined as ever, on the occa­sion of this anniver­sary to com­bat the egre­giously dis­torted image of Israel that exists in too many places in the world and on too many cam­puses and main­stream protes­tant churches in the United States.  Israel is far from per­fect as a soci­ety, in its treat­ment of its Arab com­mu­nity and of the Pales­tini­ans.  But it has always been and still is the only true democ­racy and respec­tor of human rights in the region and would have made peace with the Pales­tini­ans on many an occa­sion had it not been for ongo­ing Pales­tin­ian rejec­tion­ism.

I will con­tinue to fight the BDS folks and all those who demo­nize Israel because they are deal­ing in lies about the Jew­ish State.

At the same time, and hav­ing noth­ing to do with the dis­tor­tions from out­side, I worry about some of the direc­tions Israel is going in as an activist Jew who has spent all of his adult life fight­ing for Israel and car­ing about its future.

How will Israel remain both Jew­ish and demo­c­ra­tic if it can­not find a way out of the cur­rent stale­mate?  With all the legit­i­mate con­cerns about secu­rity, par­tic­u­larly regard­ing an expan­sion­ist and poten­tially nuclear Iran, what is going to be done about the severe domes­tic chal­lenges?  I think of three that demand imme­di­ate atten­tion:  Income inequal­ity, the need for afford­able hous­ing, and the quest for reli­gious pluralism.

So on this impor­tant day, I can live with these dual feel­ings:  An immense pride as a Jew in the glo­ries of the Jew­ish State, and a real­iza­tion that the chal­lenges fac­ing Israel are pro­found and require new initiatives.

Of course, my bot­tom line as a life­long and proud Zion­ist is a belief that Israel will emerge tri­umphant and that what­ever the obsta­cles it will face will be overcome.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

April 14, 2015 0

How to Deal With Iranian Expansionism

By Abra­ham H. Fox­man
National Direc­tor of the Anti-Defamation League

This arti­cle orig­i­nally appeared on The Huff­in­g­ton Post Blog

At the very moment that a nuclear deal with Iran is look­ing closer to real­ity, Iran is expand­ing its influ­ence through­out the Mid­dle East. To the Saudis, the Emi­rates and Israel — all of whom see Iran as the great­est threat in the region — this is a dis­turb­ing phenomenon.

Israel has reacted by call­ing on the United States to link the nuclear nego­ti­a­tions to Iran’s broader behav­ior in the region.  In his address before a joint ses­sion of Con­gress, Prime Min­is­ter Ben­jamin Netanyahu said the U.S. should not sign a deal until Iran halts its ter­ror­ist activ­ity and ceases its sup­port of extrem­ist groups. More recently, the prime min­is­ter has called for no agree­ment until Iran accepts Israel’s     legitimacy.

Not sur­pris­ingly, the U.S. rejected those pro­pos­als as unachiev­able and saw them as an effort to block any nuclear deal.

The Saudis, in their usual way, took a more restrained approach, say­ing nice things about the frame­work agree­ment while decry­ing Iran’s activ­i­ties on many fronts in the region. Clearly, at this moment when the U.S. is pro­vid­ing essen­tial sup­port for the Saudi-led mil­i­tary coali­tion against the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen, they are not look­ing for a full-blown con­fronta­tion with their main ally and sup­porter, the United States.

On the other hand, the Saudis con­tinue to express in many ways their frus­tra­tion with what they per­ceive to be weak Amer­i­can lead­er­ship in the region. While not will­ing to link their cri­tique to the nuclear issue, they have found other ways to get their point across.

Their most extreme reac­tion took place in the fall of 2013 when in an unprece­dented fash­ion they turned down a seat at the United Nations Secu­rity Coun­cil. While they never stated a rea­son it was widely under­stood to be a protest over Amer­i­can pol­icy toward Syria and Iran.

Since then, Saudi con­cerns have only grown as they watch a con­tin­ued Iran­ian role in Syria and Iraq, U.S. coop­er­a­tion with Iran against ISIS and — more recently — the poten­tial for new sig­nif­i­cant Iran­ian influ­ence in Yemen through the Houthis.

Both the Israelis and the Saudis fear that lift­ing the deep­est sanc­tions against Iran through the nuclear deal will fur­ther embolden Iran­ian expansionism.

More­over, what­ever their views on the nuclear deal, they fear that the basic under­ly­ing theme, despite U.S. protests to the con­trary, is that Iran under Pres­i­dent Has­san Rouhani is an evolv­ing nation that can be moved toward a state of nor­malcy both at home and in its inter­na­tional rela­tions. So they worry that after the nuclear deal is signed, sealed and deliv­ered, the U.S. will be even more reluc­tant to iden­tify Iran for what is and to take action against it.

What is it that the U.S. admin­is­tra­tion can do to reas­sure its allies?

First, its rhetoric about Iran­ian behav­ior must be ele­vated by many deci­bels. The notion that such a change would jeop­ar­dize the nuclear talks does not ring true. The Ira­ni­ans have a huge inter­est in the removal of sanc­tions while also being able to main­tain its nuclear infra­struc­ture. They are not very likely to walk away because of a more hon­est and focused U.S. approach to Iran­ian behavior.

It was encour­ag­ing in that respect that Sec­re­tary of State John Kerry on April 8 on PBS New­sHour crit­i­cized Iran for sup­ply­ing the Houthis in Yemen and added that the U.S. “could do two things at once” – the nuclear deal and con­tain­ment of Iran’s desta­bi­liz­ing activ­i­ties in the region.

Still, a more sus­tained U.S. approach is needed, one which rec­og­nizes that Iran remains unre­pen­tant and extreme — includ­ing recent state­ments by its lead­ers call­ing for Israel’s destruc­tion — and is the great­est threat in the region.

Call­ing atten­tion to the huge arse­nal of mis­siles amassed by Iran­ian sur­ro­gate, Hezbol­lah, is a good place to start.

Using Holo­caust Remem­brance Day on April 15 to denounce Iran’s open call for Israel’s destruc­tion, most recently by the head of the Rev­o­lu­tion­ary Guard, would add to the chorus.

And finally, the president’s remarks about hav­ing Israel’s back in the face of any Iran­ian threat should be reflected in clear agree­ments. What exactly does it mean for the U.S. to be there for Israel and Saudi Arabia?

This becomes more sig­nif­i­cant than ever because of the per­cep­tion that the eager­ness for the nuclear deal was partly moti­vated by a U.S. desire to pull back from the region. And, it is sig­nif­i­cant because Saudi con­cerns about a poten­tially expand­ing nuclear Iran could lead them to seek their own nuclear weapons.  The con­se­quences for the region and the world of such nuclear pro­lif­er­a­tion would be disastrous.

Even before the nuclear frame­work agree­ment, the U.S. had a lot of work to do to reas­sure its allies in the Mid­dle East.

The need for such reas­sur­ance takes on a greater urgency as the real­ity of the nuclear agree­ment and the prospect of an embold­ened Iran loom larger.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,