boycott divestment and sanctions » ADL Blogs
Posts Tagged ‘boycott divestment and sanctions’
November 24, 2014 0

Presbyterians Against Divestment

New York Times Ad

New York Times Ad

A full page ad in the New York Times on Thurs­day, Novem­ber 21 stated “Pres­by­te­ri­ans: We can do bet­ter than divest­ment.”  The ad, endorsed by over one hun­dred lead­ers of the Pres­by­ter­ian Church (USA) and spon­sored by Pres­by­te­ri­ans for a Just and Peace­ful Future in the Mid­dle East, is a response to the nar­row deci­sion (310–303) by the PC(USA) Gen­eral Assem­bly this past sum­mer to divest from three Amer­i­can com­pa­nies who con­duct busi­ness with Israel in the West Bank, a deci­sion the ADL deplored.

The ad calls for Pres­by­te­ri­ans to “reclaim the church’s role as ‘repair­ers of the breach’” between them­selves and other reli­gious com­mu­ni­ties, “to reaf­firm boldly the church’s com­mit­ment to two-state solu­tion,” and “to seek oppor­tu­ni­ties in Pales­tine, Israel, and between Israelis and Pales­tini­ans for proac­tive investment.”

Polling data con­sis­tently show that “main­line” Protes­tants over­whelm­ingly sup­port a safe and secure Israel, even while also being con­cerned about the sit­u­a­tion of Pales­tini­ans in the West Bank and Gaza.  The efforts at the PC(USA) and other churches to pass divest­ment res­o­lu­tions reflect the views of a minor­ity of activists within those churches who take advan­tage of the struc­tures of those churches to press their agenda.

ADL hopes this ad will pro­mote exactly the kind of respect­ful dis­cus­sion and col­lab­o­ra­tion for which it calls, as well as serve to encour­age oth­ers within the PC(USA) and other main­line Protes­tant churches who have con­sid­ered divest­ment res­o­lu­tions to look for con­struc­tive ini­tia­tives that pro­mote Israeli-Palestinian coop­er­a­tion and  reconciliation.

Tags: , , , , , ,

March 28, 2014 0

Update: BDS Resolutions Fail At Michigan And Loyola

Last week, we blogged about impend­ing divest­ment res­o­lu­tions on four U.S. col­lege cam­puses. Two of those res­o­lu­tions were voted on, and ulti­mately voted down, this week.

Here’s what happened:Michigan Divest

  • At the Uni­ver­sity of Michi­gan, a divest­ment res­o­lu­tion intro­duced by SAFE (Stu­dents Allied for Free­dom and Equal­ity) was defeated by a 25–9 vote and five absten­tions by the Cen­tral Stu­dent Gov­ern­ment (CSG). ADL praised the CSG for defeat­ing the res­o­lu­tion and also spoke out against reports that CSG rep­re­sen­ta­tives were allegedly threat­ened and called anti-Semitic slurs such as “kike”’ and “dirty Jew.”
  • At Loy­ola Uni­ver­sity, the Stu­dent Sen­ate held a sec­ond vote on SJP’s divest­ment res­o­lu­tion on Wednes­day, March 25. The res­o­lu­tion ini­tially passed with a 12–10 vote with and nine absten­tions. The next day though, the Pres­i­dent of Loyola’s United Stu­dent Gov­ern­ment Asso­ci­a­tion, Pedro Guer­rero, vetoed the res­o­lu­tion, explain­ing his deci­sion to do so on the grounds that the res­o­lu­tion “caused harm among the stu­dent com­mu­nity” and that “diver­sity of thought on cam­pus was not taken into consideration.”

Tags: , , , , , ,