Israel » ADL Blogs
Posts Tagged ‘Israel’
August 5, 2016 3

Eyes on The Prize: In Pursuit of Racial Justice, Stick to the Facts and Avoid the Fiction

By Jonathan Green­blatt
CEO of the Anti-Defamation League

This blog orig­i­nally appeared on Medium

Black Lives Matter

Ear­lier this week, a col­lec­tive of more than 50 orga­ni­za­tions asso­ci­ated with the Black Lives Mat­ter move­ment (BLM) released a detailed plat­form, A Vision for Black Lives, Pol­icy Demands for Black Power, Free­dom & Jus­tice. There are other groups asso­ci­ated with BLM who have not signed onto the Plat­form and offered dif­fer­ent approaches. Nonethe­less, the Plat­form is bold and provoca­tive in its demands. It point­edly rejects many racial equal­ity approaches tried over the past four decades. Instead, the doc­u­ment pro­poses a trans­for­ma­tional pol­icy frame for many ideas that pre­vi­ously have been artic­u­lated by activists, schol­ars and writ­ers like Bryan Steven­sonMichelle Alexan­der and Ta-Nehisi Coates.

We do not agree with many of the spe­cific demands of the Plat­form, but the doc­u­ment appro­pri­ately high­lights the need to address mass incar­cer­a­tion and a wide range of racial inequities and socio-economic issues fac­ing African Amer­i­cans today. Beyond hand-wringing and soul-searching, the Plat­form pro­poses a num­ber of spe­cific legal, admin­is­tra­tive, and leg­isla­tive reme­dies to address iden­ti­fied challenges.

We appre­ci­ate these points because the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is deeply com­mit­ted to address­ing many of these issues, too. ADL’s long­time ded­i­ca­tion to fight­ing big­otry in all forms includes build­ing a just soci­ety where fair and equal treat­ment is guar­an­teed for all. Along with coali­tion part­ners, we are tack­ling crit­i­cal civil rights issues such as end­ing racial pro­fil­ing, address­ing edu­ca­tional equity and eco­nomic inequal­i­ties, dis­rupt­ing the school-to-prison pipeline and reform­ing our crim­i­nal jus­tice system.

This work is not new. For decades, we have been work­ing closely with our civil rights part­ners in the hard fight to advance a shared agenda of equal­ity, jus­tice, and respect for human dig­nity through lead­er­ship work in edu­ca­tion, leg­is­la­tion, and lit­i­ga­tion. Where pos­si­ble, we want to engage with a range of activists to achieve these goals.

But would-be allies in the strug­gle for civil and human rights along with jus­tice and fair treat­ment can­not ignore the Platform’s false and bla­tantly one-sided posi­tion on US-Israel rela­tions and Israeli-Palestinian issues. We cat­e­gor­i­cally reject the document’s crit­i­cism of the United States and Israel as being “com­plicit in the geno­cide tak­ing place against the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple.” The Jew­ish com­mu­nity knows too much about genocide.

What­ever one’s posi­tion on the rela­tion­ship between Israel, its Pales­tin­ian cit­i­zens, and the res­i­dents in the West Bank and Gaza, it’s repel­lent and com­pletely inac­cu­rate to label Israel’s pol­icy as “geno­cide.” And the Plat­form com­pletely ignores incite­ment and vio­lence per­pe­trated against Israelis by some Pales­tini­ans, includ­ing ter­ror inside the coun­try and rocket attacks lobbed from Gaza. Unfor­tu­nately, these phe­nom­ena are not new but have been chal­lenges that have faced the Jew­ish state since its incep­tion more than half a cen­tury ago.

We strongly dis­agree with the Platform’s erro­neous broad-brush con­flat­ing of the Israeli-Palestinian con­flict with civil and human rights abuses dis­cussed in the doc­u­ment. Although Israel is far from a prin­ci­pal focal point in the more than 40,000-word doc­u­ment, it’s the irre­spon­si­ble and com­pletely over-the-top ref­er­ences to the Jew­ish state — as well as later gross mis­char­ac­ter­i­za­tions of Israel as “an apartheid state,” and calls for sup­port of the BDS move­ment (boy­cott, divest­ment and sanc­tions against Israel) that alien­ate us and bear lit­tle resem­blance to real­ity. These points are wrong on the facts and offen­sive in tone. Impor­tantly, for ADL and many in the Jew­ish com­mu­nity, such false char­ac­ter­i­za­tions and mis­guided calls to action dis­tract us from the task of address­ing other, critically-important jus­tice and equal­ity priorities.

So let’s work to keep our eyes on the prize.

In the past few weeks, we have seen sig­nif­i­cant progress in push­ing back against state voter sup­pres­sion laws and advanc­ing crim­i­nal jus­tice reforms. The Jus­tice Depart­ment is appro­pri­ately high­light­ing the need to address the crim­i­nal­iza­tion of povertyThe President’s Task Force on 21st Cen­tury Polic­ing is actively pro­mot­ing many worth­while ideas to increase police account­abil­ity and enhance police-community relations.

The vital issues of racial jus­tice we are con­fronting now — and the need to directly com­bat extrem­ism, hate vio­lence, immi­grant bash­ing, and stereo­typ­ing — require sus­tained com­mit­ments. They neces­si­tate a dis­ci­plined, relent­less focus. They demand clear-headed, fact based approaches.

We can­not walk away. We can­not be dis­tracted or dispir­ited. Those of us com­mit­ted to jus­tice can­not afford to stray from address­ing the very real injus­tices fac­ing our communities.

We are com­mit­ted to doing just that.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

July 28, 2016 5

Rep. Hank Johnson, Your Words Have a History

By Jonathan Green­blatt
CEO of the Anti-Defamation League

Much has been said and writ­ten about our response at the Anti-Defamation League to the recent com­ments by U.S. Rep. Hank John­son (D-GA) com­par­ing the Israeli set­tle­ment enter­prise to “ter­mites” under­min­ing the two-state solu­tion. (You can watch the offend­ing com­ments here begin­ning at 34:00). Some appre­ci­ated our strong words. Oth­ers anguished over our response on Twit­ter, sug­gest­ing that we did not go far enough in con­demn­ing him.

This was one of those moments when 140 char­ac­ters failed to fully con­vey our feelings.

So I wanted to take the oppor­tu­nity now to put this issue into full con­text, to explain why the remarks were so offen­sive both to Israelis and Jews across the polit­i­cal spec­trum and to elu­ci­date what elected offi­cials must do in such instances to assure the pub­lic that they do not sup­port the kind of anti-Semitic notions the remark sug­gested for so many.

First, to the remarks them­selves: As I myself tweeted, there’s absolutely no doubt that Rep. Johnson’s com­ments were both irre­spon­si­ble and rep­re­hen­si­ble, par­tic­u­larly because they played into tra­di­tional anti-Semitic canards. The image of “ter­mites” being used to describe Jews has sor­did con­no­ta­tions. In the annals of anti-Semitism, from the medieval period to Czarist Rus­sia, and most pro­nouncedly in Nazi Ger­many, there is a com­mon leit­mo­tif of Jews being por­trayed as sub­hu­man – rats, cock­roaches and other unde­sir­able crea­tures. Even today, depic­tions of Jews in anti-Semitic car­toons that per­vade the Arab press often con­form to this legacy.

Surely Rep. John­son can under­stand a people’s legit­i­mate sen­si­tiv­i­ties that emerge from a long his­tory of oppres­sion. And surely there is room for legit­i­mate and bal­anced crit­i­cisms of pol­icy which do not resort to these prej­u­diced tropes.

In light of the fact that the com­ment – inad­ver­tently or not – evoked clas­sic anti-Semitic stereo­types, our ini­tial tweet on the remarks call­ing it an “offen­sive and unhelp­ful char­ac­ter­i­za­tion” did not go far enough in spelling out pre­cisely why it was so objec­tion­able. Indeed, that impelled my sub­se­quent tweet that “yes, there was apol­ogy, but no ‘point’ jus­ti­fies refer­ring to human beings in such an abhor­rent, inap­pro­pri­ate manner.”

Our con­cern about Rep. Johnson’s remarks and those of oth­ers whom we have taken umbrage with dur­ing the cam­paign is not about politics—it’s about an expec­ta­tion of civil­ity in our pol­i­tics. ADL con­sis­tently has spo­ken out about inap­pro­pri­ate and offen­sive lan­guage made by can­di­dates and sup­port­ers of both polit­i­cal par­ties. This is not new and will never change.

Because this is an elec­tion year, peo­ple tend to read more deeply into our crit­i­cism of can­di­dates and other polit­i­cal pun­dits, sug­gest­ing our state­ments reflect a “hid­den” agenda or try­ing to pigeon­hole us as “left” or “right.”  Let me be crys­tal clear on this point. For us, it does not mat­ter whether it is a Demo­c­rat or a Repub­li­can or an Inde­pen­dent. It is the com­ment itself that jus­ti­fies our response. This is not about can­di­dates or par­ties – it is about ideas.

We will call out ideas that run counter to the val­ues we believe in so deeply – civil­ity, plu­ral­ism and tol­er­ance – even as we con­tinue to abide strictly by our sta­tus as a 501c3 non­profit which appro­pri­ately requires us not to oppose or sup­port can­di­dates for office.

All should under­stand that Rep. John­son quickly apol­o­gized and sub­se­quently restated his apol­ogy to me and to Rabbi David Wolpe. This was mean­ing­ful because we have seen oth­ers who refuse to demon­strate any pub­lic con­tri­tion after anal­o­gous lapses. But he and oth­ers need to know that it is unac­cept­able to den­i­grate any group of human beings regard­less of one’s views on the Israeli Pales­tin­ian conflict.

Con­sid­er­ing the where Rep. John­son was speak­ing adds addi­tional con­text to the sit­u­a­tion. His remarks were deliv­ered at an event spon­sored by the U.S. Cam­paign to End the Israeli Occu­pa­tion, a group with a one-sided view of this long-standing and deeply com­plex con­flict, who advo­cate for boy­cotting Israel and who pro­vide a plat­form for the most out­ra­geous charges against Israel. Rep. John­son was play­ing to a crowd—a crowd that eagerly applauded his remarks.

If we hope in any way to advance the cause of peace and rec­on­cil­i­a­tion, we need to resist demo­niza­tion of the other side, to desist from incite­ment and refuse to slide into slander.

The Israeli-Palestinian con­flict is an endur­ing one and its his­tory is com­plex. It has so far frus­trated the attempts of our country’s most able nego­tia­tors. Achiev­ing its res­o­lu­tion will not be easy and may not hap­pen soon. But one thing is for sure: assign­ing blame only to one side fails to move us any closer to that destination.

Tags: , , , , ,

July 21, 2016 Off

Israeli Flags Burned in Cairo in Protest of Foreign Minister’s Israel Visit

Egypt­ian For­eign Min­is­ter Sameh Shukri’s July 10th visit to Israel and meet­ing with Israeli PM Netanyahu was the first such trip in nine years.   In Israel, Shukri’s visit was greeted as reflec­tive of warm­ing rela­tions between Jerusalem and Cairo who signed a peace agree­ment in 1979.   For some in Egypt, the visit sparked protest against this act of normalization.

Accord­ing to reports in Arab media, Egypt­ian jour­nal­ists burned Israeli flags on Wednes­day (July 13) on the foot­steps of the Syn­di­cate of Jour­nal­ists build­ing in Cairo, shout­ing anti-Israel slo­gans. A video of the demon­stra­tion posted on YouTube by Egypt’s Al-Masrawi news­pa­per shows a group of pro­test­ers stand­ing around an Israeli flag, hold­ing addi­tional Israeli flags marked with an X. The per­son in the mid­dle is say­ing “We came today to burn this despi­ca­ble flag, the flag of the apes and pigs. We’ll also burn the pic­tures of the one called “the Prime Min­is­ter of the Zion­ists” and that of Egypt­ian For­eign Min­is­ter Sameh Shukri”. The video goes on to show them shout­ing together “We’ve been repeat­ing it gen­er­a­tion after gen­er­a­tion – we’ll treat you as enemy, Israel.”

From Twitter

From Twit­ter

Tags: , , , ,